The interview moved from the role to the wedding budget
An e-commerce candidate says a first interview pressed a room of applicants on who was ‘hungry for money’, and a second one moved into their private life. The questions reached relationship status, marriage plans and a wedding budget. Then came the availability test: replying to customers while eating, answering messages until 11 PM and on holiday.
The terms stayed harder to pin down. The author says they were not given “a clear explanation of the guaranteed base salary, commission structure, or actual compensation terms.”
The interview had asked for commitment. What that commitment would buy remained unclear.
The pressure in this account comes from the mismatch between what was being assessed and what the role required. The author describes personal questions alongside expectations of availability through late evenings and holidays.
The compensation gap sharpens that mismatch. The author reports being asked to accept broad availability while the base salary, commission and total terms remained unclear.
This is one pseudonymous account, not an independent finding about the employer, and it is published without naming the employer.